HWLIX : Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class I

HWLIX is a US Stocks Market Large Value with MODERATE fees.

HWLIX

Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class I

FI Score

40 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HWLIX vs YCS

34% FI Score
  • ycs
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Yen

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs JEMDX

34% FI Score
  • jemdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs BRPIX

34% FI Score
  • brpix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

ProFunds Bear Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs JJT

34% FI Score
  • jjt
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

iPath Series B Bloomberg Tin Subindex Total Return ETN

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs PIGSX

34% FI Score
  • pigsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

BlackRock U.S. Government Bond Portfolio Service Shares

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs AIRR

34% FI Score
  • airr
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Industrials

First Trust RBA American Industrial RenaissanceTM ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Industrials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs NAVIX

34% FI Score
  • navix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Navigator Equity Hedged Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs NAWSX

34% FI Score
  • nawsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen California High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs NELAX

34% FI Score
  • nelax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Nuveen Equity Long/Short Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs APIUX

34% FI Score
  • apiux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs ARLCX

34% FI Score
  • arlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2035 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs NSBTX

34% FI Score
  • nsbtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Short Duration Bond Fund Trust Class

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs NVGBX

34% FI Score
  • nvgbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Wells Fargo Growth Balanced Fund - Class Admin

Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs ASICX

34% FI Score
  • asicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs OBCHX

34% FI Score
  • obchx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Oberweis China Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs AWSCX

34% FI Score
  • awscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs AXEAX

34% FI Score
  • axeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

Columbia Contrarian Europe Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs PTECX

34% FI Score
  • ptecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Putnam Tax Exempt Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs OKMIX

34% FI Score
  • okmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Oklahoma Municipal Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs BLOK

34% FI Score
  • blok
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo