HWLIX : Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class I

HWLIX is a US Stocks Market Large Value with MODERATE fees.

HWLIX

Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class I

FI Score

40 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

1 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HWLIX vs GEDZX

36% FI Score
  • gedzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

GuideStone Funds Extended-Duration Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs TESGX

36% FI Score
  • tesgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Templeton Global Smaller Companies Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs CHAU

36% FI Score
  • chau
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily CSI 300 China A Share Bull 2X Shares

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs MIDU

36% FI Score
  • midu
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

Direxion Daily Mid Cap Bull 3X Shares

Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs MIEGX

36% FI Score
  • miegx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs PBZAX

36% FI Score
  • pbzax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

PIMCO Equity Series - PIMCO RealPath Blend 2020 Fund

Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs CHIK

36% FI Score
  • chik
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Information Technology ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs CHTFX

36% FI Score
  • chtfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aquila Churchill Tax Free Fund of Kentucky Class A

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs CIOAX

36% FI Score
  • cioax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Calvert International Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs CLIAX

36% FI Score
  • cliax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Invesco Income Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs REACX

36% FI Score
  • reacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

American Century Real Estate Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs ESFAX

36% FI Score
  • esfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ashmore Emerging Markets Short Duration Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs PURCX

36% FI Score
  • purcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

PGIM Global Real Estate Fund- Class C

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs DFFCX

36% FI Score
  • dffcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Davis Financial Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs PSIBX

36% FI Score
  • psibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Diversified Income Trust Class B

Expenses: 1.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs THMBX

36% FI Score
  • thmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Thrivent High Income Municipal Bond Fund Class S

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs THOCX

36% FI Score
  • thocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Thornburg Global Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs PZRMX

36% FI Score
  • pzrmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs DRIOX

36% FI Score
  • driox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Driehaus International Small Cap Growth Fund

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLIX vs DSHPX

36% FI Score
  • dshpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BNY Mellon Short Term Income Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo