HWLCX : Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class C

HWLCX is a US Stocks Market Large Value with HIGH fees.

HWLCX

Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class C

FI Score

28 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HWLCX vs ALNYX

47% FI Score
  • alnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund New York Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs SEKIX

47% FI Score
  • sekix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

DWS Emerging Markets Equity Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs URA

47% FI Score
  • ura
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Global X Uranium ETF

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs AFB

47% FI Score
  • afb
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AllianceBernstein National Municipal Income Fund

Expenses: 2.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs ARBNX

47% FI Score
  • arbnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

The Arbitrage Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs DOG

47% FI Score
  • dog
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short Dow30

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs LIFAX

47% FI Score
  • lifax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs PYACX

47% FI Score
  • pyacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden Corporate Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs VGFO

47% FI Score
  • vgfo
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Virtus WMC Global Factor Opportunities ETF

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs ABDAX

47% FI Score
  • abdax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Columbia Capital Allocation Conservative Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs PSQ

47% FI Score
  • psq
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short QQQ

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs FFIU

47% FI Score
  • ffiu
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Fieldstone UVA Unconstrained Medium-Term Fixed Income ETF

Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs AWP

47% FI Score
  • awp
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Aberdeen Global Premier Property

Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs FEO

47% FI Score
  • feo
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

First Trust/Aberdeen Emerging Opportunity Fund

Expenses: 1.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs URTY

47% FI Score
  • urty
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs BEMIX

47% FI Score
  • bemix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Brandes Emerging Markets Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs PFUNX

47% FI Score
  • pfunx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PIMCO International Bond Fund (Unhedged) Class I-3

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs DVFIX

47% FI Score
  • dvfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Cohen & Steers Alternative Income Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs GHYCX

47% FI Score
  • ghycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs SCPYX

47% FI Score
  • scpyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo