HWLCX : Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class C

HWLCX is a US Stocks Market Large Value with HIGH fees.

HWLCX

Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class C

FI Score

28 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HWLCX vs VIISX

49% FI Score
  • viisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Virtus KAR International Small-Cap Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs FAJEX

49% FI Score
  • fajex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Frost Total Return Bond Fund A Class Shares

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs CMPGX

49% FI Score
  • cmpgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Principal Government & High Quality Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs FAFJX

49% FI Score
  • fafjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Limited Term Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs MMIGX

49% FI Score
  • mmigx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal Income Fund Class B1

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs FCHPX

49% FI Score
  • fchpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Fidelity® Municipal Income 2023 Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs MMACX

49% FI Score
  • mmacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Moderate Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs OIDCX

49% FI Score
  • oidcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer International Diversified Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs MMABX

49% FI Score
  • mmabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Moderate Allocation Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs UAGNX

49% FI Score
  • uagnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

USAA Government Securities Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs DFP

49% FI Score
  • dfp
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Preferred Stock

Flaherty & Crumrine Dynamic Preferred and Income Fund

Expenses: 2.73% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Preferred Stock Other fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs USTB

49% FI Score
  • ustb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

VictoryShares USAA Core Short-Term Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs PSRAX

49% FI Score
  • psrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Pioneer Strategic Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs BSJO

49% FI Score
  • bsjo
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco BulletShares 2024 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs FSEAX

49% FI Score
  • fseax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Fidelity® Emerging Asia Fund

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs BBNTX

49% FI Score
  • bbntx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Sterling Capital North Carolina Intermediate Tax-Free Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs PABAX

49% FI Score
  • pabax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Putnam Dynamic Asset Allocation Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs MTKIX

49% FI Score
  • mtkix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2060 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs SCGVX

49% FI Score
  • scgvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Sands Capital Global Growth Fund Investor Shares

Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HWLCX vs BSCT

49% FI Score
  • bsct
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco BulletShares 2029 Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo