Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$HWDAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- gdiax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs Short Duration Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dbllx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fdhy
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hwdsx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
The Hartford World Bond Fund Class R4
Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cphyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Principal High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ihyix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya High Yield Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gsgax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- artfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Artisan High Income Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fadlx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Frost Low Duration Bond Fund Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »