Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$HRLSX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- nwwox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus Vontobel Global Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gdmix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Lazard Global Dynamic Multi-Asset Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- msdlx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- palcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AllianzGI Global Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aaapx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hdavx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Dividend & Income Builder Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wfggx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
WCM Focused Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- naefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
New Alternatives Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- cetax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Centerstone Investors Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »