HRLSX : Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4

HRLSX is a Allocation Market Total World with HIGH fees.

HRLSX

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4

FI Score

35 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

5 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

5 /10

Similar Funds

We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HRLSX vs NALFX

40% FI Score
  • nalfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

New Alternatives Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs WGFIX

40% FI Score
  • wgfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

William Blair Global Leaders Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs EADIX

40% FI Score
  • eadix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs KLDW

40% FI Score
  • kldw
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Knowledge Leaders Developed World ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs HRLIX

40% FI Score
  • hrlix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs JVGIX

40% FI Score
  • jvgix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Adaptive Global Allocation Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs PIDCX

40% FI Score
  • pidcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Pioneer Solutions - Balanced Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs MKTRX

40% FI Score
  • mktrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MainStay Income Builder Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs GIGE

40% FI Score
  • gige
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

SoFi Gig Economy ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs ARSOX

40% FI Score
  • arsox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Aristotle/Saul Global Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs RWDE

40% FI Score
  • rwde
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Direxion MSCI Developed Over Emerging Markets ETF

Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs FSTBX

40% FI Score
  • fstbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Federated Global Allocation Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs IBIAX

40% FI Score
  • ibiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Ivy Global Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs BDHCX

40% FI Score
  • bdhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BlackRock Dynamic High Income Portfolio Investor C

Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs DGFCX

40% FI Score
  • dgfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Davis Global Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs JOBIX

39% FI Score
  • jobix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

JOHCM Global Income Builder Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs FEBCX

39% FI Score
  • febcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

First Eagle Global Income Builder Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs ATWCX

39% FI Score
  • atwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

AB Tax-Managed Wealth Appreciation Strategy Class C

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs PORTX

39% FI Score
  • portx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Trillium ESG Global Equity Fund Retail Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HRLSX vs HEOIX

39% FI Score
  • heoix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Climate Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo