HQISX : The Hartford Equity Income Fund Class R4

HQISX is a US Stocks Market Large Value with HIGH fees.

HQISX

The Hartford Equity Income Fund Class R4

FI Score

50 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

4 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,043 US Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HQISX vs PLSCX

13% FI Score
  • plscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

DWS Multi-Asset Moderate Allocation Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs ABLCX

13% FI Score
  • ablcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2030 Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs MWSIX

13% FI Score
  • mwsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Metropolitan West Strategic Income Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs IOECX

13% FI Score
  • ioecx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ICON Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs REPIX

13% FI Score
  • repix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProFunds Real Estate UltraSector Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs AFAAX

13% FI Score
  • afaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Capital Income Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs ACVQX

13% FI Score
  • acvqx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

AC Alternatives® Market Neutral Value Fund A Class

Expenses: 3.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs HIPS

13% FI Score
  • hips
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs CNJFX

13% FI Score
  • cnjfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

Commonwealth Japan Fund

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs SPABX

13% FI Score
  • spabx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

SilverPepper Merger Arbitrage Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs ABRSX

13% FI Score
  • abrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Volatility

ABR Dynamic Short Volatility Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Volatility Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs ESVCX

13% FI Score
  • esvcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Global Small-Cap Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs RYFIX

13% FI Score
  • ryfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Rydex Financial Services Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs APJAX

13% FI Score
  • apjax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Aberdeen Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs GHTIX

13% FI Score
  • ghtix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Leland Real Asset Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs OBEMX

13% FI Score
  • obemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Oberweis Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs HNDL

13% FI Score
  • hndl
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Strategy Shares Nasdaq 7 Handl Index ETF

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs RYCFX

13% FI Score
  • rycfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

Rydex Biotechnology Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs LPVAX

13% FI Score
  • lpvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Dynamic 2055 Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HQISX vs CANE

13% FI Score
  • cane
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

Teucrium Sugar

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo