HLMSX : Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio Investor

HLMSX is a International Stocks Market Mid-Cap Growth with HIGH fees.

HLMSX

Harding Loevner International Small Companies Portfolio Investor

FI Score

33 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

5 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

4 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

4 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,760 International Stocks Mid-Cap Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HLMSX vs MTGAX

29% FI Score
  • mtgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Mortgage Securities Trust Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs PTBCX

29% FI Score
  • ptbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Principal Tax-Exempt Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs GGRAX

29% FI Score
  • ggrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs GLDIX

29% FI Score
  • gldix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Gabelli Gold Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs PFWDX

29% FI Score
  • pfwdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Pacific Funds Small-Cap Growth Advisor Class

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs DALI

29% FI Score
  • dali
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

First Trust Dorsey Wright DALI 1 ETF

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs SISSX

29% FI Score
  • sissx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Virtus Seix Ultra-Short Bond Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs PTRBX

29% FI Score
  • ptrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs PSCTX

29% FI Score
  • psctx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Connecticut Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs BIS

29% FI Score
  • bis
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotechnology

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs MAWCX

29% FI Score
  • mawcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

MainStay Epoch U.S. All Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs GSCDX

29% FI Score
  • gscdx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs MCCAX

29% FI Score
  • mccax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS California Municipal Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs GTANX

29% FI Score
  • gtanx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2055 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs MNREX

29% FI Score
  • mnrex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Manning & Napier Real Estate Series Class S

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs EBIZ

29% FI Score
  • ebiz
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Cyclicals

Global X E-commerce ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs MFLBX

29% FI Score
  • mflbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

MFS Lifetime 2020 Fund Class B

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs MHFAX

29% FI Score
  • mhfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

AXS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs MINC

29% FI Score
  • minc
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

AdvisorShares Newfleet Multi-Sector Income ETF

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HLMSX vs HFZYX

29% FI Score
  • hfzyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Schroders Emerging Markets Multi-Sector Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo