Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$HLMNX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,394 International Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jbalx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Janus Henderson Balanced Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- flksx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Value
Fidelity® Low-Priced Stock K6 Fund
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- iwx
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- jcaix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Global Allocation Fund - Conservative Class I
Expenses: 0.21% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jnsax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
JPMorgan SmartRetirement® 2025 Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- fcstx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Fidelity® California Limited Term Tax-Free Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mitfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BMO Intermediate Tax Free Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mmhyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
MFS Municipal High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ibmi
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
iShares iBonds Sep 2020 Term Muni Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »