Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$HLDCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- jeccx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Strategic Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nefhx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Loomis Sayles High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- epbix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
EuroPac International Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- hfhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- rldcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Victory INCORE Low Duration Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ihfax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Integrity High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pficx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Putnam Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- alhcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
AB Limited Duration High Income Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dpfcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund Class C
Expenses: 3.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »