HILSX : Hartford International Value Fund Class R4

HILSX is a International Stocks Market Large Value with HIGH fees.

HILSX

Hartford International Value Fund Class R4

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

7 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

7 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,471 International Stocks Large Value funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HILSX vs DBO

44% FI Score
  • dbo
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

Invesco DB Oil Fund

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs ALDAX

44% FI Score
  • aldax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Columbia Limited Duration Credit Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs BAPBX

44% FI Score
  • bapbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Smart Beta Retirement Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs CFSIX

44% FI Score
  • cfsix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Touchstone Sands Capital Select Growth Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs BFRAX

44% FI Score
  • bfrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

BlackRock Floating Rate Income Portfolio Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs FFA

44% FI Score
  • ffa
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Options-based

First Trust Enhanced Equity Income Fund

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Options-based Other fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs TGPCX

44% FI Score
  • tgpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

TCW Conservative Allocation Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.44% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs COTFX

44% FI Score
  • cotfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aquila Tax-Free Fund of Colorado Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs GER

44% FI Score
  • ger
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Master Limited Partnership

Goldman Sachs MLP and Energy Renaissance Fund

Expenses: 3.48% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Master Limited Partnership Other fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs TWM

44% FI Score
  • twm
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraShort Russell2000

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs DSTL

44% FI Score
  • dstl
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs BAMGX

44% FI Score
  • bamgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Sterling Capital Strategic Allocation Balanced Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs SUBYX

44% FI Score
  • subyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs OGIG

44% FI Score
  • ogig
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF

Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs HRLYX

44% FI Score
  • hrlyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs NCACX

44% FI Score
  • ncacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen California Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs MTIIX

44% FI Score
  • mtiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Infrastructure Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs PSI

44% FI Score
  • psi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Invesco Dynamic Semiconductors ETF

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs PRRAX

44% FI Score
  • prrax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Principal Real Estate Securities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HILSX vs PRRJX

44% FI Score
  • prrjx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo