Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
1 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
1 /10
$HIIIX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- bxgax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Barings Global High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- embyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
VanEck Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class Y
Expenses: 1.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mhnax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Madison High Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- esivx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Wells Fargo International Bond Fund - Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mhycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MainStay Candriam Emerging Markets Debt Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- eixcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Catalyst Enhanced Income Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- chyox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
CMG Tactical Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ledox
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Lazard Emerging Markets Debt Portfolio Open Shares
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- femgx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Templeton Emerging Markets Bond Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »