Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$HGXCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ivinx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Ivy Global Growth Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jogex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
JOHCM Global Equity Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rgoix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
RBC Global Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wwoix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus Vontobel Global Opportunities Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gmmax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Dynamic Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pidcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Pioneer Solutions - Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- fstbx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Federated Global Allocation Fund Class A Shares
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rwde
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Direxion MSCI Developed Over Emerging Markets ETF
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- kldw
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Knowledge Leaders Developed World ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »