Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
2 /10
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Hotchkis & Wiley Global Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Calvert Global Energy Solutions Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
ALPS/Red Rocks Global Opportunity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
BBH Global Core Select Fund Retail Class Shares
Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Oberweis Global Opportunities Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
LSV Global Value Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Aberdeen Global Equity Fund Institutional Service Class
Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Global Small-Cap Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Transamerica Global Equity Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map