Expense Ratio Rating
9 /10
Expense Rating
7 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$HCVIX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- prmtx
- Mutual Fund
- Sector Equity
- Communication Services
T. Rowe Price Communications & Technology Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Communication Services Sector Equity fund. See why »
- qcenx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund Class N
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sfvyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
ClearBridge All Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- sbsyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Western Asset Short-Term Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vgiix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
JPMorgan Growth And Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- wbfix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
William Blair Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- vsmv
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- qgro
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- ppilx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
DWS Short Duration Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pplt
- ETF
- Commodities
- Focused
Aberdeen Standard Physical Platinum Shares ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
- psct
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
Invesco S&P SmallCap Information Technology ETF
Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- rfg
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Growth
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- rye
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Energy
Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Energy ETF
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »
- sgvix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Government Bond
Wells Fargo Government Securities Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.48% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
- skyy
- ETF
- Sector Equity
- Technology
First Trust Cloud Computing ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
- smmu
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- smbyx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Mid-Cap Blend
ClearBridge Mid Cap Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- twmtx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Transamerica US Growth Class T
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- vafax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
Invesco American Franchise Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »