Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$HCVCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fitrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Delaware Total Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fmsdx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Fidelity® Multi-Asset Income Fund
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- seblx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Touchstone Balanced Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- mgdcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
MainStay Moderate Growth Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- fmabx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
AIG Multi-Asset Allocation Fund Class B
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ucmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
USAA Cornerstone Moderately Conservative Fund
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- valix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Value Line Capital Appreciation Fund, Inc. Investor Class
Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- araax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Horizon Active Risk Assist® Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- villx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Villere Balanced Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »