Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
0 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
0 /10
$HBFBX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 748 Allocation All-In-One funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- lspax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
LoCorr Spectrum Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 2.02% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- ghtax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Leland Real Asset Opportunities Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- tcvcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Timothy Plan Conservative Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- apigx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Yorktown Capital Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- psecx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
1789 Growth and Income Fund Class Class C
Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- apifx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Yorktown Master Allocation Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- dwatx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Arrow DWA Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- trifx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- tpdcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Timothy Plan Defensive Strategies Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »