Expense Ratio Rating
5 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
3 /10
We found 7,874 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Conservative Term Series Class S
Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
U.S. Global GO GOLD and Precious Metal Miners ETF
Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »
Invesco Oppenheimer Developing Markets Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
DWS Enhanced Commodity Strategy Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »
Fidelity Freedom® Blend 2050 Fund
Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
Fidelity® Telecom and Utilities Fund
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map