HAP : VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

HAP is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

HAP

VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

FI Score

38 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HAP vs BUFSX

44% FI Score
  • bufsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Buffalo Small Cap Fund

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs VSSWX

44% FI Score
  • vsswx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

JPMorgan Small Cap Core Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PGVFX

44% FI Score
  • pgvfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Polaris Global Value Fund

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs IOFIX

44% FI Score
  • iofix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

AlphaCentric Income Opportunities Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PFOCX

44% FI Score
  • pfocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • International

PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) Class C

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a International Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs ETG

44% FI Score
  • etg
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund

Expenses: 2.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs QIVNX

44% FI Score
  • qivnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer International Equity Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.47% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PGWAX

44% FI Score
  • pgwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

AllianzGI Focused Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs VLAAX

44% FI Score
  • vlaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Value Line Asset Allocation Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs HMVTX

44% FI Score
  • hmvtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PRJPX

44% FI Score
  • prjpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

T. Rowe Price Japan Fund

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PRJCX

44% FI Score
  • prjcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

PGIM Jennison Global Opportunities Fund-Class C

Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs USWGX

44% FI Score
  • uswgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

USAA World Growth Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs CEY

44% FI Score
  • cey
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

VictoryShares Emerging Market High Div Volatility Wtd ETF

Expenses: 0.51% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs CSAIX

44% FI Score
  • csaix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Credit Suisse Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs OTCBX

44% FI Score
  • otcbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs BPRRX

44% FI Score
  • bprrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Boston Partners Long/Short Research Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs SEACX

44% FI Score
  • seacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Crossmark Steward Select Bond Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs OPMNX

44% FI Score
  • opmnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Main Street Mid Cap Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs FIGTX

44% FI Score
  • figtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated U.S. Government Securities Fund 2-5 Year Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo