HAP : VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

HAP is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

HAP

VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

FI Score

38 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HAP vs TBAAX

44% FI Score
  • tbaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Touchstone Dynamic Diversified Income Fund A

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs COTFX

44% FI Score
  • cotfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Aquila Tax-Free Fund of Colorado Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs AAHYX

44% FI Score
  • aahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MBAPX

44% FI Score
  • mbapx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Praxis Genesis Balanced Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.52% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs BAPBX

44% FI Score
  • bapbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

BlackRock LifePath® Smart Beta Retirement Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.32% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs VANTX

44% FI Score
  • vantx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

JPMorgan New York Tax Free Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs JFESX

44% FI Score
  • jfesx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

JPMorgan Europe Dynamic Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs AGIZX

44% FI Score
  • agizx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Alger Growth & Income Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs ANGCX

44% FI Score
  • angcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Angel Oak Multi-Strategy Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs ARYIX

44% FI Score
  • aryix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2035 Portfolio Investor Class

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs FPXI

44% FI Score
  • fpxi
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PDINX

44% FI Score
  • pdinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Putnam Diversified Income Trust Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PRJPX

44% FI Score
  • prjpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

T. Rowe Price Japan Fund

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MVIN

44% FI Score
  • mvin
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Natixis Seeyond International Minimum Volatility ETF

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MTIIX

44% FI Score
  • mtiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Infrastructure Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs CCFTX

44% FI Score
  • ccftx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Funds 2035 Target Date Retirement Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MNDAX

44% FI Score
  • mndax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

MFS New Discovery Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs JCLMX

44% FI Score
  • jclmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Moderate Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs HMVTX

44% FI Score
  • hmvtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Hartford MidCap Value Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs ECASX

44% FI Score
  • ecasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital SMID-Cap Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo