HAP : VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

HAP is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

HAP

VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

FI Score

38 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HAP vs MCLOX

47% FI Score
  • mclox
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BlackRock Global Allocation Fund, Inc. Investor C Shares

Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MCA

47% FI Score
  • mca
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BlackRock MuniYield California Quality Fund, Inc.

Expenses: 2.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs OPER

47% FI Score
  • oper
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Short

ClearShares Ultra-Short Maturity ETF

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs ALGRX

47% FI Score
  • algrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Alger Focus Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.92% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs ABASX

47% FI Score
  • abasx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

AB Discovery Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs GHYB

47% FI Score
  • ghyb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Goldman Sachs Access High Yield Corporate Bond ETF

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs UEVM

47% FI Score
  • uevm
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

VictoryShares USAA MSCI Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs GHYCX

47% FI Score
  • ghycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Goldman Sachs High Yield Municipal Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs SCWCX

47% FI Score
  • scwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

American Funds SMALLCAP World Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.82% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MIMYX

47% FI Score
  • mimyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs SCPYX

47% FI Score
  • scpyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Carillon Reams Core Plus Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs ASHX

47% FI Score
  • ashx
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Xtrackers MSCI China A Inclusion Equity ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs BWLIX

47% FI Score
  • bwlix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

American Beacon Bridgeway Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs LSFYX

47% FI Score
  • lsfyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles Senior Floating Rate and Fixed Income Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs SDVGX

47% FI Score
  • sdvgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sit Dividend Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs OHYAX

47% FI Score
  • ohyax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

JPMorgan High Yield Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MLACX

47% FI Score
  • mlacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

MainStay Winslow Large Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs OSINX

47% FI Score
  • osinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Strategic Income Class R

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MLDAX

47% FI Score
  • mldax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Short Duration Income Portfolio Class A

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs FMHI

47% FI Score
  • fmhi
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

First Trust Municipal High Income ETF

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo