HAP : VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

HAP is a Sector Equity Market Basic Materials with MODERATE fees.

HAP

VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF

FI Score

38 /100

Diversification Rating

0 /10

Expense Ratio Rating

8 /10

Expense Rating

5 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare HAP vs MINDX

48% FI Score
  • mindx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

Matthews India Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs BOPIX

48% FI Score
  • bopix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sterling Capital Special Opportunities Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs WTMF

48% FI Score
  • wtmf
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Future

WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PTSOX

48% FI Score
  • ptsox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

PIMCO RAE PLUS International Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs FLQH

48% FI Score
  • flqh
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Franklin LibertyQ International Equity Hedged ETF

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs IUSS

48% FI Score
  • iuss
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Invesco RAFI Strategic US Small Company ETF

Expenses: 0.23% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs FLRSX

48% FI Score
  • flrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2030 Retirement Target Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.34% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs SDOW

48% FI Score
  • sdow
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short Dow30

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs FIMSX

48% FI Score
  • fimsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Fidelity® Municipal Income 2025 Fund

Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs HQBTX

48% FI Score
  • hqbtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class R5

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PYHRX

48% FI Score
  • pyhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden High Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PRTNX

48% FI Score
  • prtnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

PIMCO Real Return Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs DFJ

48% FI Score
  • dfj
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs RVRS

48% FI Score
  • rvrs
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Reverse Cap Weighted U.S. Large Cap ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PYARX

48% FI Score
  • pyarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden Absolute Return Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs HSCYX

48% FI Score
  • hscyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

The Hartford Small Company Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PRFIX

47% FI Score
  • prfix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Parnassus Fixed Income Fund

Expenses: 0.68% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs MIIBX

47% FI Score
  • miibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Madison High Quality Bond Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PSQ

47% FI Score
  • psq
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares Short QQQ

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare HAP vs PSOAX

47% FI Score
  • psoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

JPMorgan Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo