GTSGX : Madison Mid Cap Fund Class Y

GTSGX is a US Stocks Market Mid-Cap Blend with MODERATE fees.

GTSGX

Madison Mid Cap Fund Class Y

FI Score

45 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,161 US Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GTSGX vs TGMBX

37% FI Score
  • tgmbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Corporate Bond Fund- Class Z

Expenses: 0.55% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs LABAX

37% FI Score
  • labax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Loomis Sayles Strategic Alpha Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs HFRO

37% FI Score
  • hfro
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Highland Income Fund

Expenses: 3.39% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs GLO

37% FI Score
  • glo
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Tactical Allocation

Clough Global Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 4.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Tactical Allocation Other fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs MNRIX

37% FI Score
  • mnrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Manning & Napier Real Estate Series Class I

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs EDD

37% FI Score
  • edd
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund

Expenses: 3.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs ARDC

37% FI Score
  • ardc
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Ares Dynamic Credit Allocation Fund, Inc.

Expenses: 3.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs GILFX

37% FI Score
  • gilfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Guggenheim Limited Duration Fund C-Class

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs ARYAX

37% FI Score
  • aryax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2035 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs JPC

37% FI Score
  • jpc
  • Mutual Fund
  • Other
  • Preferred Stock

Nuveen Preferred & Income Opportunities Fund

Expenses: 3.04% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Preferred Stock Other fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs EFF

37% FI Score
  • eff
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Floating-Rate Income Plus Fund

Expenses: 3.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs PBTRX

37% FI Score
  • pbtrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

PGIM Global Total Return Fund - Class B

Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs IDRV

37% FI Score
  • idrv
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

iShares Self-Driving EV and Tech ETF

Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs IPOS

37% FI Score
  • ipos
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Renaissance International IPO ETF

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs PBRIX

37% FI Score
  • pbrix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Federated Prudent Bear Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 2.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs OGMCX

37% FI Score
  • ogmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Invesco Oppenheimer Gold & Special Minerals Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs PHLAX

37% FI Score
  • phlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Healthcare

PGIM Jennison Health Sciences Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs PYEWX

37% FI Score
  • pyewx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden Emerging Markets Bond Fund Advisor Class

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs GCGGX

37% FI Score
  • gcggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

DWS GNMA Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.57% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GTSGX vs ECIBX

37% FI Score
  • ecibx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Income Fund of Boston Class C

Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo