GSYAX : Goldman Sachs Imprint Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund Class A

GSYAX is a International Stocks Market Emerging Markets with HIGH fees.

GSYAX

Goldman Sachs Imprint Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund Class A

FI Score

15 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

2 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

1 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

1 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,038 International Stocks Emerging Markets funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GSYAX vs ECFVX

22% FI Score
  • ecfvx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Eaton Vance Focused Value Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs NFIAX

22% FI Score
  • nfiax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Neuberger Berman Floating Rate Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs MONTX

22% FI Score
  • montx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Monetta Fund

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs HCMEX

22% FI Score
  • hcmex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

HCM Income Plus Fund Class A Shares

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs NSPCX

22% FI Score
  • nspcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Voya SmallCap Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs JPHF

22% FI Score
  • jphf
  • ETF
  • Other
  • Multialternative

JPMorgan Diversified Alternative ETF

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Multialternative Other fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs OKMUX

22% FI Score
  • okmux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Oklahoma Municipal Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs ORILX

22% FI Score
  • orilx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

North Square Multi Strategy Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs RDMIX

22% FI Score
  • rdmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Future

Rational/ReSolve Adaptive Asset Allocation Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs NWJTX

22% FI Score
  • nwjtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nationwide Loomis Short Term Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.27% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs MECEX

22% FI Score
  • mecex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MainStay Epoch Capital Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs MSMTX

22% FI Score
  • msmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Mortgage Securities Trust Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs AADGX

22% FI Score
  • aadgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Aasgard Dividend Growth Small & Mid-Cap Fund No Load Class

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs AFALX

22% FI Score
  • afalx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Applied Finance Core Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs AFGGX

22% FI Score
  • afggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs APGRX

22% FI Score
  • apgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Yorktown Growth Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 1.46% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs ARGMX

22% FI Score
  • argmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2060 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs AVACX

22% FI Score
  • avacx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs HQBCX

22% FI Score
  • hqbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Hartford Quality Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSYAX vs BGIIX

22% FI Score
  • bgiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Brandes Global Equity Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo