GSXIX : Aberdeen U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund Institutional Service Class

GSXIX is a US Stocks Market Small Growth with MODERATE fees.

GSXIX

Aberdeen U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund Institutional Service Class

FI Score

44 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

6 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

6 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

6 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GSXIX vs AIVOX

32% FI Score
  • aivox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

American Century International Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs AIWCX

32% FI Score
  • aiwcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

American Century International Growth Fund C Class

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs ADOAX

32% FI Score
  • adoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

ACM Dynamic Opportunity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs ADOCX

32% FI Score
  • adocx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Alger Dynamic Opportunities Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.93% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs ANYCX

32% FI Score
  • anycx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

AB Municipal Income Fund New York Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs APINX

32% FI Score
  • apinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

AMG Managers Pictet International Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs APPLX

32% FI Score
  • applx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Appleseed Fund Investor Share

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs AREEX

32% FI Score
  • areex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

American Century Real Estate Fund A Class

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs ARFMX

32% FI Score
  • arfmx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2050 Portfolio A Class

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs ARNCX

32% FI Score
  • arncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2020 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs ASNAX

32% FI Score
  • asnax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

AllianzGI Retirement 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs ATTCX

32% FI Score
  • attcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice In Retirement Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs AWPAX

32% FI Score
  • awpax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

AB Sustainable International Thematic Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.44% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs BACAX

32% FI Score
  • bacax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund Investor A Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs BACSX

32% FI Score
  • bacsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

BlackRock Energy Opportunities Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs BAEMX

32% FI Score
  • baemx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

BMO LGM Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs LSGGX

32% FI Score
  • lsggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund Class Y

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs PBRCX

32% FI Score
  • pbrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Federated Prudent Bear Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 3.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs BGLBX

32% FI Score
  • bglbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

BMO Global Low Volatility Equity Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSXIX vs BGRSX

32% FI Score
  • bgrsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Boston Partners Global Long/Short Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.72% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo