Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
10 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$GSSQX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 668 US Stocks Large Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- slasx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Selected American Shares Fund Class S
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- sdvgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Sit Dividend Growth Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- afdax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
American Century Sustainable Equity Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ptoax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
PIMCO StocksPLUS® Absolute Return Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- seekx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Crossmark Steward Large Cap Enhanced Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- amca
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
iShares Russell 1000 Pure U.S. Revenue ETF
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- chgx
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Change Finance U.S. Large Cap Fossil Fuel Free ETF
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- wil
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Barclays Women in Leadership ETN
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- nbstx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Neuberger Berman Sustainable Equity Fund Trust Class
Expenses: 1.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »