GSSMX : Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund Class A

GSSMX is a US Stocks Market Small Blend with HIGH fees.

GSSMX

Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value Fund Class A

FI Score

49 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

3 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

10 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,203 US Stocks Small Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GSSMX vs PMNTX

34% FI Score
  • pmntx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

PIMCO National Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs PGVAX

34% FI Score
  • pgvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

PGIM Government Income Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs JMTCX

34% FI Score
  • jmtcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

JPMorgan Total Return Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs PPUCX

34% FI Score
  • ppucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

PIMCO StocksPLUS® International Fund (Unhedged) Class C

Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs CHIH

34% FI Score
  • chih
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Global X MSCI China Health Care ETF

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs GMAN

34% FI Score
  • gman
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

Goldman Sachs Manufacturing Revolution ETF

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs MIMAX

34% FI Score
  • mimax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs CFICX

34% FI Score
  • cficx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calvert Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs MJ

34% FI Score
  • mj
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Other

ETFMG Alternative Harvest ETF

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Other Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs FTXG

34% FI Score
  • ftxg
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Consumer Defensive

First Trust Nasdaq Food & Beverage ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Consumer Defensive Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs CDICX

34% FI Score
  • cdicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Calvert Short Duration Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.55% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs WFGGX

34% FI Score
  • wfggx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

WCM Focused Global Growth Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs RJA

34% FI Score
  • rja
  • ETF
  • Commodities
  • Focused

ELEMENTS Linked to the Rogers International Commodity Index - Agriculture Total Return

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Focused Commodities fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs DELNX

34% FI Score
  • delnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DoubleLine Low Duration Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs RBGCX

34% FI Score
  • rbgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs NGCCX

34% FI Score
  • ngccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Columbia Greater China Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs ESHIX

34% FI Score
  • eshix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration High Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs HIPSX

34% FI Score
  • hipsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Hartford Inflation Plus Fund Class R4

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs FEUZ

34% FI Score
  • feuz
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Europe Stock

First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX ETF

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Europe Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSSMX vs PFI

34% FI Score
  • pfi
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Invesco DWA Financial Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo