GSHCX : Goldman Sachs High Yield Fund Class C

GSHCX is a Bond Market High Yield Bond with HIGH fees.

GSHCX

Goldman Sachs High Yield Fund Class C

FI Score

33 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

8 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

8 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,623 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GSHCX vs NNTWX

44% FI Score
  • nntwx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Nicholas II Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs NWCAX

44% FI Score
  • nwcax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs JTD

44% FI Score
  • jtd
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Nuveen Tax-Advantaged Dividend Growth Fund

Expenses: 2.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs NWHZX

44% FI Score
  • nwhzx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Nationwide Geneva Small Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs OLD

44% FI Score
  • old
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

The Long-Term Care ETF

Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs OPMNX

44% FI Score
  • opmnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Invesco Oppenheimer Main Street Mid Cap Fund Class R

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs OTCBX

44% FI Score
  • otcbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs USWGX

44% FI Score
  • uswgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

USAA World Growth Fund Adviser Shares

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs VLAAX

44% FI Score
  • vlaax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Value Line Asset Allocation Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs VSSWX

44% FI Score
  • vsswx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

JPMorgan Small Cap Core Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs MBAGX

44% FI Score
  • mbagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs MCAGX

44% FI Score
  • mcagx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

MFS Aggressive Growth Allocation Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs OCMIX

44% FI Score
  • ocmix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Invesco Select Risk: Moderate Investor Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs OSGCX

44% FI Score
  • osgcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

JPMorgan Small Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs OSMCX

44% FI Score
  • osmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Invesco Oppenheimer International Small-Mid Company Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.07% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs OTCCX

44% FI Score
  • otccx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

MFS Mid Cap Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs MTIIX

44% FI Score
  • mtiix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Global Equity

Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund, Inc. Global Infrastructure Portfolio Class I

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Global Equity Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs MVIN

44% FI Score
  • mvin
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Natixis Seeyond International Minimum Volatility ETF

Expenses: 0.56% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs AGIZX

44% FI Score
  • agizx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Alger Growth & Income Fund Class Z

Expenses: 0.69% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GSHCX vs AAHYX

44% FI Score
  • aahyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo