Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
6 /10
We found 10,038 International Stocks China Stock funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
Neuberger Berman Mid Cap Intrinsic Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »
Goldman Sachs Technology Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »
Guggenheim StylePlus - Mid Growth Fund Institutional
Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Eaton Vance Government Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.99% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »
Arrow Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
AXS Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 2.69% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Future Alternatives fund. See why »
Franklin Strategic Mortgage Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
Meritage Growth Equity Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust High Yield Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.
Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!
Join & Get Your First Course Free© 2024 Adam Fortuna
Site Map