Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
5 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$GPAPX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 11,034 Alternative Short funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- lilax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
BlackRock LifePath® Index 2025 Fund Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.36% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- pjfzx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
PGIM Jennison Growth Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- dfpax
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
BNY Mellon Diversified International Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- dgrw
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Fund
Expenses: 0.28% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- dhs
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Value
WisdomTree U.S. High Dividend Fund
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- ibmk
- ETF
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
iShares iBonds Dec 2022 Term Muni Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fatkx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® 2020 Fund Class K6
Expenses: 0.43% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- fdtkx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Fidelity Freedom® 2025 Fund Class K6
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- gsew
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Goldman Sachs Equal Weight U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »