Expense Ratio Rating
3 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
7 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
7 /10
$GLVNX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- eadix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Tax-Managed Global Dividend Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pidcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Pioneer Solutions - Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- mctrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MainStay Income Builder Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.91% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ggscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Goldman Sachs Growth Strategy Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jobix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
JOHCM Global Income Builder Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- deqax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
BNY Mellon Global Equity Income Fund - Class A
Expenses: 1.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gyld
- ETF
- Allocation
- Total World
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ewenx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Wells Fargo Intrinsic World Equity Fund - Class Inst
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- aggrx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
American Century Focused Global Growth Fund A Class
Expenses: 1.32% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »