GLO : Clough Global Opportunities Fund

GLO is a Other Market Tactical Allocation with HIGH fees.

GLO

Clough Global Opportunities Fund

FI Score

37 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

$GLO Alternatives

See More

Different Funds

We found 11,484 Other Tactical Allocation funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GLO vs JOLIX

22% FI Score
  • jolix
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Janus Henderson Emerging Markets Managed Volatility Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs DPTAX

22% FI Score
  • dptax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

BNY Mellon Tax Managed Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs CIGCX

22% FI Score
  • cigcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Calamos International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.85% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs MSMTX

22% FI Score
  • msmtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Morgan Stanley Mortgage Securities Trust Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs FPPAX

22% FI Score
  • fppax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

MFS Prudent Investor Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs IGNAX

22% FI Score
  • ignax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

Ivy Natural Resources Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs PEMBX

22% FI Score
  • pembx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Putnam Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class B

Expenses: 2.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs AFLEX

22% FI Score
  • aflex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Anfield Universal Fixed Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs CUHCX

22% FI Score
  • cuhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Victory US 500 Enhanced Volatility Wtd Index Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs LTFCX

22% FI Score
  • ltfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Columbia Acorn Select Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.92% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs CGAVX

22% FI Score
  • cgavx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

Causeway Global Absolute Return Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs FTTCX

22% FI Score
  • fttcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Franklin LifeSmart™ 2025 Retirement Target Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs CVISX

22% FI Score
  • cvisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Causeway International Small Cap Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs CVLCX

22% FI Score
  • cvlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Calamos Global Growth & Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs IREAX

22% FI Score
  • ireax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

Ivy LaSalle Global Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.51% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs GGRCX

22% FI Score
  • ggrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs OEMAX

22% FI Score
  • oemax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Invesco Oppenheimer Emerging Markets Local Debt Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs CCBAX

22% FI Score
  • ccbax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

City National Rochdale Corporate Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs OCMPX

22% FI Score
  • ocmpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Lazard International Quality Growth Portfolio Open Shares

Expenses: 1.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs DPFAX

22% FI Score
  • dpfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Deer Park Total Return Credit Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo