GLO : Clough Global Opportunities Fund

GLO is a Other Market Tactical Allocation with HIGH fees.

GLO

Clough Global Opportunities Fund

FI Score

37 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

$GLO Alternatives

See More

Different Funds

We found 11,484 Other Tactical Allocation funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GLO vs FCNBX

25% FI Score
  • fcnbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Templeton International Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs LMSBX

25% FI Score
  • lmsbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Municipal Bond Fund Class B Shares

Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs AFOIX

25% FI Score
  • afoix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Alger Mid Cap Focus Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs IMANX

25% FI Score
  • imanx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Iman Fund Class K

Expenses: 1.34% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs FHICX

25% FI Score
  • fhicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Federated High-Income Bond Fund Class C Shares

Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs FHK

25% FI Score
  • fhk
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

First Trust Hong Kong AlphaDEX Fund

Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs AMGAX

25% FI Score
  • amgax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.30% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs ASGTX

25% FI Score
  • asgtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Transamerica Small Cap Growth A

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs LEND

25% FI Score
  • lend
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

Amplify CrowdBureau(R) Peer-to-Peer Lending & Crowdfunding ETF

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs GRES

25% FI Score
  • gres
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Basic Materials

IQ Global Resources ETF

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Basic Materials Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs LTUCX

25% FI Score
  • ltucx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs FUSGX

25% FI Score
  • fusgx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Government Bond

Federated Fund for U.S. Government Securities Class A shares

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Government Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs LVAFX

25% FI Score
  • lvafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

LSV Global Managed Volatility Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs GTAJX

25% FI Score
  • gtajx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Goldman Sachs Target Date 2030 Portfolio A Shares

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs GCINX

25% FI Score
  • gcinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Green Century MSCI International Index Fund Individual Investor

Expenses: 1.28% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs GIGAX

25% FI Score
  • gigax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Aberdeen International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.52% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs MCPCX

25% FI Score
  • mcpcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

BlackRock Asian Dragon Fund,Inc.Investor C Shares

Expenses: 2.08% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs HFHRX

25% FI Score
  • hfhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate High Income Fund Class R3

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs JNVSX

25% FI Score
  • jnvsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Jensen Quality Value Fund Class J

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs HLMOX

25% FI Score
  • hlmox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Emerging Markets

Harding Loevner Frontier Emerging Markets Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo