GLO : Clough Global Opportunities Fund

GLO is a Other Market Tactical Allocation with HIGH fees.

GLO

Clough Global Opportunities Fund

FI Score

37 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

$GLO Alternatives

See More

Different Funds

We found 11,484 Other Tactical Allocation funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GLO vs DITEX

47% FI Score
  • ditex
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BNY Mellon Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs CPCFX

47% FI Score
  • cpcfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Invesco Core Plus Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs MAFRX

47% FI Score
  • mafrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternative
  • Short

Pioneer Multi-Asset Ultrashort Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs FMN

47% FI Score
  • fmn
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Federated Premier Municipal Income Fund

Expenses: 2.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs BRWAX

47% FI Score
  • brwax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS Blended Research Growth Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs PUI

47% FI Score
  • pui
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Utilities

Invesco DWA Utilities Momentum ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs BIB

47% FI Score
  • bib
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares Ultra Nasdaq Biotechnology

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs MBFCX

47% FI Score
  • mbfcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Wells Fargo Core Bond Fund - Class C

Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs GSPAX

47% FI Score
  • gspax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Goldman Sachs U.S. Equity Dividend and Premium Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.12% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs GSSFX

47% FI Score
  • gssfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Inverse

Gotham Short Strategies Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs KHYIX

47% FI Score
  • khyix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

DWS High Income Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs PXQSX

47% FI Score
  • pxqsx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Growth

Virtus KAR Small-Cap Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs DUGAX

47% FI Score
  • dugax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Delaware U.S. Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs MENKX

47% FI Score
  • menkx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

BlackRock New York Municipal Opportunities Fund Investor A Shares

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs HWVIX

47% FI Score
  • hwvix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Diversified Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs XSW

47% FI Score
  • xsw
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Technology

SPDR S&P Software & Services ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Technology Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs MGLAX

47% FI Score
  • mglax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Real Estate

MFS Global Real Estate Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs MGRBX

47% FI Score
  • mgrbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS International Growth Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs MGRCX

47% FI Score
  • mgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

MFS International Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs ERBIX

47% FI Score
  • erbix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Eaton Vance Richard Bernstein Equity Strategy Fund Class I

Expenses: 1.01% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo