GLO : Clough Global Opportunities Fund

GLO is a Other Market Tactical Allocation with HIGH fees.

GLO

Clough Global Opportunities Fund

FI Score

37 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

10 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

10 /10

$GLO Alternatives

See More

Different Funds

We found 11,484 Other Tactical Allocation funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GLO vs MTZIX

48% FI Score
  • mtzix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2055 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs ACSYX

48% FI Score
  • acsyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Invesco Comstock Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs POBAX

48% FI Score
  • pobax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Pacific Funds Portfolio Optimization Moderate-Conservative Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs ESGF

48% FI Score
  • esgf
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global ESG Revenue ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs HFDYX

48% FI Score
  • hfdyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Blend

Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opportunities Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs PEEAX

48% FI Score
  • peeax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

PGIM Jennison Mid-Cap Growth Fund- Class A

Expenses: 1.07% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs RYTRX

48% FI Score
  • rytrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Royce Total Return Fund Investment Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs EPI

48% FI Score
  • epi
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

WisdomTree India Earnings Fund

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs JGRCX

48% FI Score
  • jgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs WFEIX

48% FI Score
  • wfeix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Wells Fargo Enterprise Fund - Class Inst

Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs CPOAX

48% FI Score
  • cpoax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Growth

Morgan Stanley Insight Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.16% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs JDGTX

48% FI Score
  • jdgtx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Janus Henderson Global Income Managed Volatility Fund Class T

Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs DISAX

48% FI Score
  • disax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

BNY Mellon International Stock Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs USNYX

48% FI Score
  • usnyx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

USAA New York Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs PDCZX

48% FI Score
  • pdczx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

PGIM Income Builder Fund-Class Z

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs BOPIX

48% FI Score
  • bopix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Sterling Capital Special Opportunities Fund Institutional Shares

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs CRAK

48% FI Score
  • crak
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

VanEck Vectors Oil Refiners ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs JBLBX

48% FI Score
  • jblbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class B

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs PRMAX

48% FI Score
  • prmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Class A

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GLO vs JCLBX

48% FI Score
  • jclbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

John Hancock Funds II Multimanager Lifestyle Balanced Portfolio Class C

Expenses: 1.23% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo