Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
3 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
3 /10
$GLNCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- dprcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Delaware Global Listed Real Assets Fund C Class
Expenses: 2.17% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rltcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
RiverFront Asset Allocation Aggressive Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- esvax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Global Small-Cap Equity Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.35% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- railx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Conductor Global Equity Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- icgex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Voya Global Equity Dividend Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- flfgx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Meeder Global Allocation Fund Retail Class
Expenses: 1.68% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- csmox
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Chiron SMid Opportunities Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gnxix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.42% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pfadx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
PFG BNY Mellon Diversifier Strategy Fund Class R
Expenses: 2.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- trxax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hgdix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AAM/HIMCO Global Enhanced Dividend Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- ccgex
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Calamos Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.15% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gmacx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Diversified Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- raalx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Conductor Global Equity Value Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.94% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- cogcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Select Global Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rgscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AllianzGI Global Small-Cap Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.37% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- izscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Invesco Select Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.77% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gmmcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Dynamic Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gnxax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
AlphaCentric Robotics and Automation Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.67% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »