Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
1 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$GLIFX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 9,682 Allocation Global Equity funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- tlvix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Thrivent Large Cap Value Fund Class S
Expenses: 0.54% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- jisgx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Growth
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth Fund Class L
Expenses: 0.84% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- jvlix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.81% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- flcsx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Fidelity® Large Cap Stock Fund
Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- flql
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Franklin LibertyQ U.S. Equity ETF
Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- ebnd
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Emerging Markets Local Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.30% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- bci
- ETF
- Commodities
- Broad
Aberdeen Standard Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- ibdr
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
iShares iBonds Dec 2026 Term Corporate ETF
Expenses: 0.10% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- corp
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Investment Grade Corporate Bond Index Exchange-Traded Fund
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »