Expense Ratio Rating
2 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
5 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
5 /10
$GLDAX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,815 Sector Equity Basic Materials funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- comb
- ETF
- Commodities
- Broad
GraniteShares Bloomberg Commodity Broad Strategy No K-1 ETF
Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Broad Commodities fund. See why »
- psopx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Small Value
JPMorgan Small Cap Value Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- mqlfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
MFS Limited Maturity Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dgrs
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Small Blend
WisdomTree U.S. SmallCap Quality Dividend Growth Fund
Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- cttix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Calvert Responsible Municipal Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mtqix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Target-Date
Manning & Napier Target 2035 Series Class I
Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »
- muxax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Victory S&P 500 Index Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.53% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- thyfx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Thrivent Diversified Income Plus Fund Class S
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- drtax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
BNY Mellon Municipal Bond Fund
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »