Expense Ratio Rating
0 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$GITCX Alternatives
Different Funds
We found 10,815 Sector Equity Technology funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- gtlix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Glenmede Quantitative U.S. Large Cap Core Equity Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- hewj
- ETF
- International Stocks
- Japan Stock
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF
Expenses: 0.49% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »
- jmom
- ETF
- US Stocks
- Large Growth
JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF
Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »
- hfqtx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Value
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »
- nwffx
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Emerging Markets
American Funds New World Fund® Class F-1
Expenses: 1.00% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Emerging Markets International Stocks fund. See why »
- nyvtx
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Blend
Davis New York Venture Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »
- jpdvx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
JPMorgan Diversified Fund Class L
Expenses: 0.57% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- oakix
- Mutual Fund
- International Stocks
- Large Blend
Oakmark International Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »
- jsosx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
JPMorgan Strategic Income Opportunities Fund Class I Shares
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ahtfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Funds American High-Income Trust® Class F-1
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- avlix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
American Century Value Fund I Class
Expenses: 0.80% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- axbax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- All-In-One
Columbia Capital Allocation Aggressive Portfolio Class A
Expenses: 0.47% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »
- lswwx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Loomis Sayles Global Allocation Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- lsdix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Total US Bond Market
Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund Y Class
Expenses: 0.40% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »
- begix
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Sterling Capital Equity Income Fund Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.76% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- bsiix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BlackRock Strategic Income Opportunities Portfolio Institutional Shares
Expenses: 0.74% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- peyax
- Mutual Fund
- US Stocks
- Large Value
Putnam Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »
- pfnix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Low Duration Income Fund I-3
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »