GIRCX : Goldman Sachs International Real Estate Securities Fund Class C

GIRCX is a Sector Equity Market Real Estate with HIGH fees.

GIRCX

Goldman Sachs International Real Estate Securities Fund Class C

FI Score

10 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

0 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

0 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 10,678 Sector Equity Real Estate funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GIRCX vs LGWIX

34% FI Score
  • lgwix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Ladenburg Growth Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs AWSCX

34% FI Score
  • awscx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Total World

Invesco Global Core Equity Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs HWLAX

34% FI Score
  • hwlax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs AUXFX

34% FI Score
  • auxfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Auxier Focus Fund Class Investor

Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs CHMCX

34% FI Score
  • chmcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Columbia High Yield Municipal Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.50% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs KMDIX

34% FI Score
  • kmdix
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Keeley Mid Cap Dividend Value Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.96% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs ASICX

34% FI Score
  • asicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock

Invesco Asia Pacific Growth Fund Class C

Expenses: 2.18% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Asia/Pacific ex-Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs GABEX

34% FI Score
  • gabex
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Gabelli Equity Income Fund Class AAA

Expenses: 1.45% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs DQICX

34% FI Score
  • dqicx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

BNY Mellon Equity Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs KNOW

34% FI Score
  • know
  • ETF
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Value

Direxion All Cap Insider Sentiment Shares

Expenses: 0.66% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs ARLCX

34% FI Score
  • arlcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

American Century Investments One Choice 2035 Portfolio C Class

Expenses: 1.81% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs HSNCX

34% FI Score
  • hsncx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

The Hartford Strategic Income Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs KNTAX

34% FI Score
  • kntax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

DWS New York Tax-Free Income Fund - Class A

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs TTT

34% FI Score
  • ttt
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Inverse

ProShares UltraPro Short 20+ Year Treasury

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Inverse Alternative fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs NCINX

34% FI Score
  • ncinx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Nicholas High Income Fund Class Institutional

Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs NBQAX

34% FI Score
  • nbqax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Growth

Nuveen International Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Growth International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs APIUX

34% FI Score
  • apiux
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Yorktown Multi-Asset Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs LMRNX

34% FI Score
  • lmrnx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

1919 Socially Responsive Balanced Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.91% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs GSGRX

34% FI Score
  • gsgrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Value

Goldman Sachs Equity Income Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GIRCX vs ESHIX

34% FI Score
  • eshix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Eaton Vance Short Duration High Income Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo