Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
9 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
9 /10
$GIOCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- egrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Eaton Vance Global Macro Absolute Return Advantage Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.29% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- plbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Pacific Funds Floating Rate Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.71% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- psrzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PIMCO Senior Floating Rate Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nhicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Neuberger Berman High Income Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.83% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- dsicx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Diamond Hill Corporate Credit Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fdbcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Bond Fund Class C Shares
Expenses: 1.66% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- padcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Absolute Return Bond Fund- Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fdbbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated Bond Fund Class B Shares
Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- apecx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Columbia High Yield Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.79% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »