Expense Ratio Rating
7 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
8 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
8 /10
$GILPX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- fdhy
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Fidelity High Yield Factor ETF
Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ibnd
- ETF
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays International Corporate Bond ETF
Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- scffx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Shenkman Capital Short Duration High Income Fund Class F
Expenses: 0.73% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- ihyix
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya High Yield Bond Fund Class I
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cphyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Principal High Yield Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.94% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- gsgax
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Goldman Sachs Investment Grade Credit Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.72% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- artfx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Artisan High Income Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fadlx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Frost Low Duration Bond Fund Investor Class Shares
Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- excpx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Manning & Napier Unconstrained Bond Series Class S
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »