Expense Ratio Rating
1 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
6 /10
Category Score
0 /10
Market Size
6 /10
$GIFCX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 1,315 Bond High Yield Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- ifrcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Voya Floating Rate Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.80% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- acskx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
American Century Short Duration Fund C Class
Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhycx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated High Yield Trust Class C
Expenses: 1.78% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mhnyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Madison High Income Fund Class Y
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fcnbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Templeton International Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.38% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pajzx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
PGIM Global Dynamic Bond Fund- Class Z
Expenses: 0.85% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- baedx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
BlackRock Emerging Markets Flexible Dynamic Bond Portfolio Investor A Shares
Expenses: 0.93% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- fhbbx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Federated High-Income Bond Fund Class B Shares
Expenses: 1.74% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cpitx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- High Yield Bond
Counterpoint Tactical Income Fund Class I
Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »