Expense Ratio Rating
4 /10
Expense Rating
0 /10
Market Score
4 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
4 /10
$GICPX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- seefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Saturna Sustainable Equity Fund
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nqgax
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen NWQ Global Equity Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- jvgtx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Janus Henderson Adaptive Global Allocation Fund Class T
Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- msdlx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Morgan Stanley Institutional Fund Trust Global Strategist Portfolio Class L
Expenses: 1.53% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- hrlsx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Hartford Global Real Asset Fund Class R4
Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- rsscx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Columbia Global Opportunities Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- sghix
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Sextant Global High Income Fund
Expenses: 0.75% (Better than 1% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- naefx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
New Alternatives Fund Investor Shares
Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- wfggx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
WCM Focused Global Growth Fund Investor Class
Expenses: 1.40% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »