GICCX : Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund Class C

GICCX is a International Stocks Market Mid-Cap Blend with HIGH fees.

GICCX

Goldman Sachs International Small Cap Insights Fund Class C

FI Score

43 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

9 /10

Category Score

5 /10

Market Size

9 /10

Different Funds

We found 9,823 International Stocks Mid-Cap Blend funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GICCX vs PYHRX

48% FI Score
  • pyhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden High Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs MMHBX

48% FI Score
  • mmhbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal High Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs JGRCX

48% FI Score
  • jgrcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Mid-Cap Growth

Janus Henderson Enterprise Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.70% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs RYTRX

48% FI Score
  • rytrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Blend

Royce Total Return Fund Investment Class

Expenses: 1.21% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs MTZIX

48% FI Score
  • mtzix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2055 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs MTMAX

48% FI Score
  • mtmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MainStay MacKay Total Return Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.88% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs SENCX

48% FI Score
  • sencx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Touchstone Large Cap Focused Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs FSCAX

48% FI Score
  • fscax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Small Value

Nuveen Small Cap Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Small Value US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs NETL

48% FI Score
  • netl
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Real Estate

Fundamental Income Net Lease Real Estate ETF

Expenses: 0.60% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Real Estate Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs FSMB

48% FI Score
  • fsmb
  • ETF
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

First Trust Short Duration Managed Municipal ETF

Expenses: 0.45% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs NVHCX

48% FI Score
  • nvhcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

Nuveen Short Duration High Yield Municipal Bond Fund Class C2

Expenses: 1.31% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs TNEAX

48% FI Score
  • tneax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Invesco Balanced-Risk Retirement 2050 Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.25% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs OARLX

48% FI Score
  • oarlx
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Oakmark Select Fund Service Class

Expenses: 1.24% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs NWFAX

48% FI Score
  • nwfax
  • Mutual Fund
  • US Stocks
  • Large Blend

Nationwide Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs LSDRX

48% FI Score
  • lsdrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

Loomis Sayles Intermediate Duration Bond Fund A Class

Expenses: 0.65% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs OCIO

48% FI Score
  • ocio
  • ETF
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

ClearShares OCIO ETF

Expenses: 0.67% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs TMAFX

47% FI Score
  • tmafx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • All-In-One

Thrivent Moderately Aggressive Allocation Fund Class S

Expenses: 1.14% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a All-In-One Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs UTBPX

47% FI Score
  • utbpx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

UBS Total Return Bond Fund Class P

Expenses: 0.50% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs URA

47% FI Score
  • ura
  • ETF
  • Sector Equity
  • Energy

Global X Uranium ETF

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Energy Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GICCX vs URTY

47% FI Score
  • urty
  • ETF
  • Alternative
  • Leveraged Equities

ProShares UltraPro Russell2000

Expenses: 0.95% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Leveraged Equities Alternative fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2025   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo