• gimax
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Columbia Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class V

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• nprtx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Large Value

Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.86% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Value US Stocks fund. See why »

• rth
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Consumer Cyclicals

VanEck Vectors Retail ETF

Expenses: 0.35% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Consumer Cyclicals Sector Equity fund. See why »

• hflix
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

Hartford Floating Rate Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• hrscx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Growth

Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.08% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Small Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• sigwx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Small Blend

Touchstone Small Company Fund Class Y

Expenses: 0.87% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Small Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• fdmo
• ETF
• US Stocks
• Large Growth

Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF

Expenses: 0.29% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Large Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• gmfzx
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Target-Date

GuideStone Funds MyDestination 2045 Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

• opgix
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

Invesco Oppenheimer Global Opportunities Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• gwmtx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

AMG GW&K Municipal Bond Fund Class N

Expenses: 0.71% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• ncatx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• Municipal Bond

Northern California Tax-Exempt Fund

Expenses: 0.46% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

• cmgsx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Growth

BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio Service Shares

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Growth US Stocks fund. See why »

• parmx
• Mutual Fund
• US Stocks
• Mid-Cap Blend

Parnassus Mid Cap Fund

Expenses: 0.99% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Mid-Cap Blend US Stocks fund. See why »

• phdg
• ETF
• Alternatives
• Short

Invesco S&P 500 Downside Hedged ETF

Expenses: 0.39% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

• iehs
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Healthcare

iShares Evolved U.S. Healthcare Staples ETF

Expenses: 0.18% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Healthcare Sector Equity fund. See why »

• mfbfx
• Mutual Fund
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

MFS Corporate Bond Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.78% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• tail
• ETF
• Alternatives
• Inverse

Cambria Tail Risk ETF

Expenses: 0.59% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Inverse Alternatives fund. See why »

• shag
• ETF
• Bond
• High Yield Bond

WisdomTree Yield Enhanced U.S. Short-Term Aggregate Bond Fund

Expenses: 0.12% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

• gaoax
• Mutual Fund
• Allocation
• Total World

JPMorgan Global Allocation Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.05% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »

• idu
• ETF
• Sector Equity
• Utilities

iShares U.S. Utilities ETF

Expenses: 0.42% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is an OK choice for a Utilities Sector Equity fund. See why »