GCGCX : Goldman Sachs Concentrated Growth Fund Class C

GCGCX is a US Stocks Market Large Growth with HIGH fees.

GCGCX

Goldman Sachs Concentrated Growth Fund Class C

FI Score

21 /100

Expense Ratio Rating

1 /10

Expense Rating

0 /10

Market Score

2 /10

Category Score

8 /10

Market Size

2 /10

Different Funds

We found 8,019 US Stocks Large Growth funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.

Compare GCGCX vs LTXCX

48% FI Score
  • ltxcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

American Funds Limited Term Tax Exempt Bond Fund® Class C

Expenses: 1.33% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs DFJ

48% FI Score
  • dfj
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

WisdomTree Japan SmallCap Dividend Fund

Expenses: 0.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs PTSOX

48% FI Score
  • ptsox
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Value

PIMCO RAE PLUS International Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.22% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Value International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs PRMAX

48% FI Score
  • prmax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Putnam RetirementReady Maturity Class A

Expenses: 0.38% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs MCHFX

48% FI Score
  • mchfx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • China Stock

Matthews China Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.09% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a China Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs MDHIX

48% FI Score
  • mdhix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

MainStay MacKay Short Duration High Yield Fund Class I

Expenses: 0.79% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs NLSAX

48% FI Score
  • nlsax
  • Mutual Fund
  • Alternatives
  • Short

Neuberger Berman Long Short Fund Class A

Expenses: 2.13% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Short Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs HDVAX

48% FI Score
  • hdvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Hartford International Equity Fund Class A

Expenses: 0.97% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs TGVAX

48% FI Score
  • tgvax
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

Thornburg International Value Fund Class A

Expenses: 1.26% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs MNA

48% FI Score
  • mna
  • ETF
  • Alternatives
  • Neutral

IQ Merger Arbitrage ETF

Expenses: 0.77% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Neutral Alternatives fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs MRBCX

48% FI Score
  • mrbcx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Total US Bond Market

MFS Total Return Bond Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.54% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Total US Bond Market Bond fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs MRICX

48% FI Score
  • mricx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Research International Fund Class C

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs MRIBX

48% FI Score
  • mribx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • Large Blend

MFS Research International Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.84% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Large Blend International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs EWJV

48% FI Score
  • ewjv
  • ETF
  • International Stocks
  • Japan Stock

iShares MSCI Japan Value ETF

Expenses: 0.15% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Japan Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs PRISX

48% FI Score
  • prisx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Sector Equity
  • Financial Services

T. Rowe Price Financial Services Fund

Expenses: 0.83% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Financial Services Sector Equity fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs PYARX

48% FI Score
  • pyarx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden Absolute Return Bond Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.70% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs PYHRX

48% FI Score
  • pyhrx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • High Yield Bond

Payden High Income Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 0.62% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a High Yield Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs MINDX

48% FI Score
  • mindx
  • Mutual Fund
  • International Stocks
  • India Stock

Matthews India Fund Investor Class

Expenses: 1.11% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a India Stock International Stocks fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs MMHBX

48% FI Score
  • mmhbx
  • Mutual Fund
  • Bond
  • Municipal Bond

MFS Municipal High Income Fund Class B

Expenses: 1.41% (Better than 0% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »

Compare GCGCX vs MTZIX

48% FI Score
  • mtzix
  • Mutual Fund
  • Allocation
  • Target-Date

Manning & Napier Target 2055 Series Class I

Expenses: 0.20% (Better than 1% of similar funds)

This is a bad choice for a Target-Date Allocation fund. See why »

Minafi - The intersection of FI, minimalism & mindfulness.

Don't miss out on new posts, courses, interactive articles and more!

Join & Get Your First Course Free

© 2026   Adam Fortuna

Site Map
Triangle Graduation Cap Angle Down Book regular Phone laptop regular fire regular fire regular search regular Acorn duotone Seedling duotone thumbs down duo thumbs up duo