Expense Ratio Rating
6 /10
Expense Rating
3 /10
Market Score
2 /10
Category Score
8 /10
Market Size
2 /10
$GCBAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 746 Bond Municipal Bond funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- aztcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Aquila Tax-Free Trust of Arizona Class C
Expenses: 1.58% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- vmttx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Viking Tax-Free Fund For Montana Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- mbnyx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
MFS New York Municipal Bond Fund Class B
Expenses: 1.62% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- cotcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Aquila Tax-Free Fund of Colorado Class C
Expenses: 1.65% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- pimex
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Putnam Intermediate-Term Municipal Income Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.89% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- avacx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio Class C
Expenses: 1.56% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- okmux
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Oklahoma Municipal Fund Class A
Expenses: 0.98% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- nitcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Aquila Narragansett Tax-Free Income Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.63% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »
- lctcx
- Mutual Fund
- Bond
- Municipal Bond
Columbia Connecticut Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.25% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Municipal Bond Bond fund. See why »