Expense Ratio Rating
8 /10
Expense Rating
2 /10
Market Score
10 /10
Category Score
5 /10
Market Size
10 /10
$GBLAX Alternatives
Similar Funds
We found 633 Allocation Total World funds. Here they are ordered by FI Score.
- nglcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Neuberger Berman Global Allocation Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.59% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- nugcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Nuveen Santa Barbara Global Dividend Growth Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.90% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pptcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Virtus KAR Global Quality Dividend Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- brlcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
MFS Blended Research Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 1.64% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- esvcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Eaton Vance Global Small-Cap Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.10% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- trxcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Catalyst/MAP Global Balanced Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.06% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- gllcx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
Aberdeen Global Equity Fund Class C
Expenses: 2.19% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pfsux
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
RiskPro® PFG Aggressive 30+ Fund Class R
Expenses: 2.00% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »
- pfdpx
- Mutual Fund
- Allocation
- Total World
RiskPro® Dynamic 15-25 Fund Class R
Expenses: 2.03% (Better than 0% of similar funds)
This is a bad choice for a Total World Allocation fund. See why »